Mission Object Graph™
A dynamic relationship layer connecting the people, systems, assets, evidence, decisions, authorities, actions, and outcomes that define a mission.
Mission information has value through what it connects.
An observation gains significance through its source, object, location, time, affected objective, supporting and contradictory evidence, responsive asset, access policy, approval authority, decision use, and resulting outcome. Mission Object Graph™ makes these relationships computable.
The graph exposes dependency, impact, and authority.
Objectives and Capabilities
An objective depends on a capability; a threat can endanger that objective.
Observations and Evidence
A source supports a claim while other evidence may contradict it.
People and Organizations
An actor belongs to an organization and holds a mission role.
Assets and Tasks
An asset is assigned to a task within constraints and authority.
Policies and Authority
A policy constrains an authority that can expire or be revoked.
Actions and Outcomes
A decision authorizes an action that produces an attributable outcome.
Every mission claim should retain its basis.
The graph understands who may act, within which boundary, and when.
Mission authority is represented through verified identity, organizational role, mission assignment, delegating authority, permitted action, scope, time, geography, approval, policy condition, and revocation state. Objects and relationships evolve as observations arrive, confidence changes, identities resolve, objectives change, assets change status, policies update, authority changes, decisions are approved, actions occur, and outcomes become known.